- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Because your motion detection sensitivity setting combined with your camera placement are not optimal
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Positioning is key. Like any PIR detector device (think motion-activated lights), motion AT the camera is harder to detect than motion ACROSS the FOV. Post screenshots of what the camera(s) see for suggestions.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
"High" isn't a sensitivity setting. A car at 20 feet should be fine but you'll need to increase the motion sensitivity from what it is stock standard
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I would try to tilt the front camera down some to help minimize the view. I'd also turn it to the left in increments to get action more across the FOV but it's rather limited to do so. For the back, the view across the yard is the killer. People detection is only 20 feet or so, best case so placing the camera closer to where action is anticipated would definitely help. It may require 2 (or more) cameras if you really need to cover the whole yard. You could then use nested rules where one camera triggers another, like this:
cam1 detects, cam1 records
cam1 detects, cam2 records
cam2 detects, cam2 records
cam2 detects, cam1 records
etc.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content