- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I am considering purchasing an Arlo Pro 2 2-camera system, but since I live in a rural area, the best upload speed I can get is .65 Mbps. Will the system still work and if so, what issues may I run across?
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Related Labels:
-
Before You Buy
Accepted Solutions
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I don’t know the actual answer for Arlo, but I can say that I have two NestCam cameras on a DSL circuit which provides about 1 Mbps and they work. NestCams record continuously, so each of those cameras is a pretty heavy load on that uplink. If you are only using Arlo for motion recording and not for continuous video recording, I would “think” you could get by on .65 Mbps with a small Arlo system. It would depend on the differences in implementation between Arlo and NestCam, of course. However, it would seem that Arlo would need to have a ton of overhead traffic or really fat motion recordings with poor buffering, to equal the same bandwidth consumption as a continuous video recording from a NestCam.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
In all honesty, the min upload speed is recommended at 1 Mbs for Pro cameras... I could see issues happening
Morse is faster than texting!
--------------------------------------
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I don’t know the actual answer for Arlo, but I can say that I have two NestCam cameras on a DSL circuit which provides about 1 Mbps and they work. NestCams record continuously, so each of those cameras is a pretty heavy load on that uplink. If you are only using Arlo for motion recording and not for continuous video recording, I would “think” you could get by on .65 Mbps with a small Arlo system. It would depend on the differences in implementation between Arlo and NestCam, of course. However, it would seem that Arlo would need to have a ton of overhead traffic or really fat motion recordings with poor buffering, to equal the same bandwidth consumption as a continuous video recording from a NestCam.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
You can also change the video resolution to Optimized or Best Battery life to minimize the size of the videos so the upload speed would be less of an issue.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thank you to all who replied. Since my plan is to only use 1 camera at a time (it's going to be a critter cam), I went ahead and purchased a two-camera system. While the connection isn't perfect smooth all the time, the low upload speed is quite adequate for single-camera use so far. Now, the -24 degree Celsius cold spell, on the other hand, doesn't make the system happy! 😞
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi @FrankSheppard,
Do know that the minimum operating temperature for the Arlo Pro 2 is -4°F (-20°C). You can read more about it here: How do I keep my Arlo batteries charged in cold weather?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Yes, but thank you for the reminder! I just hadn't performed the F to C conversion.
-
Arlo Mobile App
581 -
Arlo Pro 2
11 -
Arlo Smart
170 -
Before You Buy
982 -
Features
420 -
Firmware Release Notes
57 -
Google Assistant
1 -
IFTTT (If This Then That)
24 -
Installation
1,125 -
Online and Mobile Apps
865 -
Service and Storage
317 -
SmartThings
37 -
Troubleshooting
6,197