Arlo|Smart Home Security|Wireless HD Security Cameras|NETGEAR
Reply
Aspirant

Arlo Pro 2: usability with less than 1Mbps upload speed

I am considering purchasing an Arlo Pro 2 2-camera system, but since I live in a rural area, the best upload speed I can get is .65 Mbps. Will the system still work and if so, what issues may I run across?

Message 1 of 7

Accepted Solutions
Mentor

Re: Arlo Pro 2: usability with less than 1Mbps upload speed

I don’t know the actual answer for Arlo, but I can say that I have two NestCam cameras on a DSL circuit which provides about 1 Mbps and they work.  NestCams record continuously, so each of those cameras is a pretty heavy load on that uplink.  If you are only using Arlo for motion recording and not for continuous video recording, I would “think” you could get by on .65 Mbps with a small Arlo system.  It would depend on the differences in implementation between Arlo and NestCam, of course.  However, it would seem that Arlo would need to have a ton of overhead traffic or really fat motion recordings with poor buffering, to equal the same bandwidth consumption as a continuous video recording from a NestCam.

Message 3 of 7

All Replies
Guru

Re: Arlo Pro 2: usability with less than 1Mbps upload speed

In all honesty, the min upload speed is recommended at 1 Mbs for Pro cameras... I could see issues happening

 

--------------------------------------
Morse is faster than texting!
--------------------------------------
Message 2 of 7
Mentor

Re: Arlo Pro 2: usability with less than 1Mbps upload speed

I don’t know the actual answer for Arlo, but I can say that I have two NestCam cameras on a DSL circuit which provides about 1 Mbps and they work.  NestCams record continuously, so each of those cameras is a pretty heavy load on that uplink.  If you are only using Arlo for motion recording and not for continuous video recording, I would “think” you could get by on .65 Mbps with a small Arlo system.  It would depend on the differences in implementation between Arlo and NestCam, of course.  However, it would seem that Arlo would need to have a ton of overhead traffic or really fat motion recordings with poor buffering, to equal the same bandwidth consumption as a continuous video recording from a NestCam.

Message 3 of 7
Highlighted
Guru

Re: Arlo Pro 2: usability with less than 1Mbps upload speed

You can also change the video resolution to Optimized or Best Battery life to minimize the size of the videos so the upload speed would be less of an issue.

Message 4 of 7
Aspirant

Re: Arlo Pro 2: usability with less than 1Mbps upload speed

Thank you to all who replied. Since my plan is to only use 1 camera at a time (it's going to be a critter cam), I went ahead and purchased a two-camera system. While the connection isn't perfect smooth all the time, the low upload speed is quite adequate for single-camera use so far. Now, the -24 degree Celsius cold spell, on the other hand, doesn't make the system happy! :-(

 

Message 5 of 7
Arlo Moderator

Re: Arlo Pro 2: usability with less than 1Mbps upload speed

Hi @FrankSheppard,

 

Do know that the minimum operating temperature for the Arlo Pro 2 is -4°F (-20°C). You can read more about it here: How do I keep my Arlo batteries charged in cold weather?

Message 6 of 7
Aspirant

Re: Arlo Pro 2: usability with less than 1Mbps upload speed

Yes, but thank you for the reminder! I just hadn't performed the F to C conversion.

Message 7 of 7