- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Been testing the new sw vs the older ( using cached copy of old )
It appears that the new sw does not function well with "nested" rules ( rules with cam A to record on B AND B record on A at same time with A on A, B on B ).
All of my older modes and rules came over as custom but not 100% the same.
First I had to go in and verity the sense was the same as old version ( some rules changed to default 80% )
After they were the same, I ran two sets of videos.
Same 3 cameras, 2 videos done mins apart; 1 vid on old sw1, 1 vid on new sw2; ***Only diff was SW***
SEE ATTACHED PIC, two large rooms "L" shaped, entry on right side of pic
red dots are cams
Old SW1
cam A detects as entering room/ FOV, no delay
cam B detects 16+ feet away coming straight to camera
cam C detects after turning corner. about 15 ft
New SW2
cam A detects 12+ ft in from entry
cam B misses walk thru
cam c detects 8 ft away
Latest Notes / end results
I was able to improve the response of the cameras ( but not to the extent that it was ). I manage to get distance shortened ( before trigger ) by about half in SW2.
This was done by deleting all the custom rules brought over and rebuilding them ( why it makes a diff I have no clue as I did rework them originally to make sure all settings were the same )
I think the major problem is how the new sw reacts to the rules as A to A, B to B , A to B, B to A ( all running at same time). I found the best results with the swapped cameras running first in listings ( esp the slowest reacting camera B with straight on motion going first ) Some how it appears the first rule is taking more precedence than the second
hope this helps a few.
Morse is faster than texting!
--------------------------------------
- Related Labels:
-
Modes and Rules

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
TomMac,
This is good information. I am going to do some investigating of my own with this as well. Thanks for the in-depth write up.
JamesC

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
JamesC wrote:TomMac,
This is good information. I am going to do some investigating of my own with this as well. Thanks for the in-depth write up.
JamesC
James..
I also sent along two videos showing exactly the situ... if you need to see same , PM me
tks
Tom
Morse is faster than texting!
--------------------------------------
