- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I made a quick video using both Original Arlo vs. the new Arlo Pro showing how much faster motion-detection capture is with the new Pro.
This was one of my biggest complaints and frustration in the original Arlo (how many times did you capture a leg in a video clip???).
As you can see, the Pro is MUCH better.
I made two quick examples of myself running across the scene, allowing both cameras to capture, at same settings.
- Related Labels:
-
Before You Buy
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Nice job...
Morse is faster than texting!
--------------------------------------
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Really nice comparison.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Just to clarify, is this showing the Arlo Pro starting capture MUCH sooner than the Arlo?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
yes
Morse is faster than texting!
--------------------------------------
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
aWanderer wrote:Just to clarify, is this showing the Arlo Pro starting capture MUCH sooner than the Arlo?
Yes, it captures MUCH sooner than the original Arlo. So far, very pleased.
I also noticed that the Video color is more cooler and more natural in the Pro, versus the more warmer orange tint that the original camera gave.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Nice comparison. Is it done with both original and Pro camera attached to a NEW Pro base station? Or are both the original and the Pro cameras attached to an original base station?
Have also been wondering if the recording on the new Pro camera starts quicker AND is also then faster again if it sends to the USB while it waits to connect to the internet/arlo cloud.
Just wondering. Thanks
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
donttrustthem wrote:Nice comparison. Is it done with both original and Pro camera attached to a NEW Pro base station? Or are both the original and the Pro cameras attached to an original base station?
This was done using the New Pro base station.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I bought the Arlo 6 camera set. 2 indoor (not using at the moment) and 4 Arlo wireless for outdoor. I am finding the time that it starts recording annoying. I wonder if adding an Arlo Pro will improve my situation since I would be adding it to the Arlo (non-pro) base station?
I'd really like to keep the wireless convenience but the delay makes the Arlo practically useless.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I went to Best Buy yesterday (I hate them) and bought an Arlo Pro to add to my existing Arlo (non Pro cams and base) to test for myself if there is any difference in the the performance of the Arlo and Arlo Pro cameras. I was able to quickly add the Arlo Pro to the existing Arlo (non Pro) setup. I intentionally set it up this way to test to see if there is any performace difference in the 2 camera models.
Let me say unequivicolly that there is a major difference between the Arlo and the Arlo Pro. The Arlo Pro instantaneously begins recording, with no measurable lag time.
So in my opinion, the Arlo cameras are a waste of money. The Arlo Pros do what I need - begin recording the nanosecond motion is detected.
(imo) All the talk blaming networks, hitting the server is baloney. The lag time is a problem inherent to the Arlo camera, not network or server, etc.
I still like the setup, I will get another 3 Arlo Pro cameras today (the one I bought yesterday came with the Arlo Pro base - even though I told the urchin at Best Buy I only wanted camera)
I've owned my Arlo setup for 3 or 4 months now. I really do like the wireless concept. I've only been on this support site for less than a week, but I am finding, as with most sites like this, you really have to dig for the info you need because there are people that blow smoke.
It's too late for me, but going forward I will advise anyone considering to buy the Arlo Pro, not the Arlo. It's cheaper, but if you want to actually RECORD anything usefull, the Arlo is a waste of money.
-
Apple HomeKit
1 -
Arlo Mobile App
362 -
Arlo Pro
27 -
Arlo Pro 2
1 -
Arlo Pro 3
2 -
Arlo Secure
1 -
Arlo Smart
86 -
Arlo Ultra
1 -
Arlo Web and Mobile Apps
6 -
Arlo Wire-Free
10 -
Before You Buy
1,183 -
Discovery
1 -
Features
205 -
Firmware
1 -
Firmware Release Notes
119 -
Hardware
2 -
IFTTT
1 -
IFTTT (If This Then That)
48 -
Installation
1,401 -
Installation & Upgrade
1 -
Online and Mobile Apps
1,266 -
Partner Integrations
1 -
Security
1 -
Service and Storage
563 -
Smart Subscription
1 -
SmartThings
39 -
Software & Apps
1 -
Troubleshooting
7,186 -
Videos
1
- « Previous
- Next »