<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Arlo camera coverage arc in Arlo</title>
    <link>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Arlo/Arlo-camera-coverage-arc/m-p/1352458#M40892</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;The original wireless cameras cover 110 degrees while the Pros cover 130 degrees. The PIRs cover the whole scene, too. &amp;nbsp;14 feet up is a bit far and may lead to an issue of how the motion is seen by the camera. &amp;nbsp;Motion is best detected, especially if it's slow, side to side, across the FOV.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2017 23:21:52 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jguerdat</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-08-19T23:21:52Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Arlo camera coverage arc</title>
      <link>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Arlo/Arlo-camera-coverage-arc/m-p/1352370#M40877</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;What is coverage area for an Arlo camera?&amp;nbsp; I spent the morning staining my deck that is covered by an Arlo camera. When I was working on the part of the deck that's 8-16 feet away, the Arlo camera activated and took my picture. But when I was closer to the house, less than 8 feet from the camera the camera did not detect me. The camera is about 14 feet up on the side of the house and I was in the part of the picture the camera captures, but I did not show up when I was more directly under the camera. What is the actual arc of coverage for activation?&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2017 20:09:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Arlo/Arlo-camera-coverage-arc/m-p/1352370#M40877</guid>
      <dc:creator>CKWatson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-19T20:09:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Arlo camera coverage arc</title>
      <link>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Arlo/Arlo-camera-coverage-arc/m-p/1352458#M40892</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The original wireless cameras cover 110 degrees while the Pros cover 130 degrees. The PIRs cover the whole scene, too. &amp;nbsp;14 feet up is a bit far and may lead to an issue of how the motion is seen by the camera. &amp;nbsp;Motion is best detected, especially if it's slow, side to side, across the FOV.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2017 23:21:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Arlo/Arlo-camera-coverage-arc/m-p/1352458#M40892</guid>
      <dc:creator>jguerdat</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-19T23:21:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Arlo camera coverage arc</title>
      <link>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Arlo/Arlo-camera-coverage-arc/m-p/1352692#M40913</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Guru,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the reply.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So 14' up is too high, I think I'll remount it about 8'.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I thought higher would give me more coverage, which it does in terms of what the camera captures, but I didn't anticipate the impact of camera activation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So the 110 degrees is side-to-side; is it also up-and-down?&amp;nbsp; Creating a "cone" of movement coverage?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So although the camera will record a wider field, the activation is much narrower than the picture coverage if I interpret your answer correctly.&amp;nbsp; This explains a lot about why my 8 cameras do or do not pickup on movement.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks again.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Chris&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 Aug 2017 15:35:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Arlo/Arlo-camera-coverage-arc/m-p/1352692#M40913</guid>
      <dc:creator>CKWatson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-20T15:35:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Arlo camera coverage arc</title>
      <link>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Arlo/Arlo-camera-coverage-arc/m-p/1352740#M40919</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I believe the 110 degree angle of view is corner to corner, diagonally. The PIR covers the same area, maybe even a bit more. Poor detection is usually an issue of the exact angle of motion, with side to side being best. &amp;nbsp;Post screenshots for suggestions.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 Aug 2017 16:28:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Arlo/Arlo-camera-coverage-arc/m-p/1352740#M40919</guid>
      <dc:creator>jguerdat</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-20T16:28:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

