<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Thoughts about Arlo Smart in Arlo Smart</title>
    <link>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Arlo-Smart/Thoughts-about-Arlo-Smart/m-p/1801841#M6416</link>
    <description>&lt;DIV class="_3xX726aBn29LDbsDtzr_6E _1Ap4F5maDtT1E1YuCiaO0r D3IL3FD0RFy_mkKLPwL4" data-click-id="text"&gt;
&lt;DIV class="_292iotee39Lmt0MkQZ2hPV RichTextJSON-root"&gt;
&lt;P class="_1qeIAgB0cPwnLhDF9XSiJM"&gt;I watched the live stream this morning and decided to go ahead and sign up for the free trial. Setup was straightforward and simple. There is, however, one big issue I have noticed. The lag between detected motion and an alert coming through used to be just a few seconds. Now it’s averaging about 20 seconds. I assume the video is streamed to their servers, analyzed, then the notification is issued if the algorithm detects motion that matches the zone area and/or person detection I’ve selected. I’m sure that takes time, but I wasn’t expecting quite that much lag.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class="_1qeIAgB0cPwnLhDF9XSiJM"&gt;I am still testing the new features with my 5 cameras (some original Arlo, some Pro). Maybe since it’s the first couple of days and there’s a lot of signups and new activity, they may be dealing with higher bandwidth and server load. Regardless of the reason, a few seconds of lag is OK, but 20 seconds seems unusable. A quick package thief will snatch a box from your door and be gone in 20 seconds. You might have them on video, but too late for siren or voice.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2020 17:44:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>bhoolbela92</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-11-26T17:44:22Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Thoughts about Arlo Smart</title>
      <link>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Arlo-Smart/Thoughts-about-Arlo-Smart/m-p/1801841#M6416</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="_3xX726aBn29LDbsDtzr_6E _1Ap4F5maDtT1E1YuCiaO0r D3IL3FD0RFy_mkKLPwL4" data-click-id="text"&gt;
&lt;DIV class="_292iotee39Lmt0MkQZ2hPV RichTextJSON-root"&gt;
&lt;P class="_1qeIAgB0cPwnLhDF9XSiJM"&gt;I watched the live stream this morning and decided to go ahead and sign up for the free trial. Setup was straightforward and simple. There is, however, one big issue I have noticed. The lag between detected motion and an alert coming through used to be just a few seconds. Now it’s averaging about 20 seconds. I assume the video is streamed to their servers, analyzed, then the notification is issued if the algorithm detects motion that matches the zone area and/or person detection I’ve selected. I’m sure that takes time, but I wasn’t expecting quite that much lag.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class="_1qeIAgB0cPwnLhDF9XSiJM"&gt;I am still testing the new features with my 5 cameras (some original Arlo, some Pro). Maybe since it’s the first couple of days and there’s a lot of signups and new activity, they may be dealing with higher bandwidth and server load. Regardless of the reason, a few seconds of lag is OK, but 20 seconds seems unusable. A quick package thief will snatch a box from your door and be gone in 20 seconds. You might have them on video, but too late for siren or voice.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2020 17:44:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Arlo-Smart/Thoughts-about-Arlo-Smart/m-p/1801841#M6416</guid>
      <dc:creator>bhoolbela92</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-11-26T17:44:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Thoughts about Arlo Smart</title>
      <link>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Arlo-Smart/Thoughts-about-Arlo-Smart/m-p/1801906#M6418</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;That is what you will find and it will vary dependent of connection speed.&amp;nbsp; I canceled my plan once and the notifications were almost instant but then you lose the purpose of smart.&amp;nbsp; I have trees around so that could be 100 notifications for motion per day and that can be irritating.&amp;nbsp; I do think the smart plan has much room for improvement both in correct identification and in speed of identification.&amp;nbsp; By today's standards both suck.&amp;nbsp; So for now it's a choice between smart and many unwanted notifications.&amp;nbsp; There are some DVR's and NVR's today that can do it right at the local storage and I wish the Arlo hub would but the cloud is their business so I doubt it.&amp;nbsp; So it depends on their improving it but nobody will completely get rid of lag to and from the cloud.&amp;nbsp; I will go DVR/NVR when these break down, just hope they increase the cams width by then or I will have to double the number of cams.&amp;nbsp; I have most of mine at 180 and will need 2 at each point with cams that don't.&amp;nbsp; The cost wouldn't be more, just the need for more.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2020 03:35:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Arlo-Smart/Thoughts-about-Arlo-Smart/m-p/1801906#M6418</guid>
      <dc:creator>LandJS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-11-27T03:35:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

