<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Wi-Fi jammers in Arlo Secure</title>
    <link>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Arlo-Secure/Wi-Fi-jammers/m-p/1909732#M3606</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;How is Arlo counteracting Wi-Fi jammers? I am very invested in the Arlo ecosystem with multiple cameras, doorbell and monthly subscription.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, I don’t feel like staying loyal to it in the long run because they have not addressed a major flaw with their cameras - ie they can be jammed with cheap Wi-Fi jammers from eBay.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Even Nest has addressed this in the sense that if Wi-Fi connection is lost to the newest Nest outdoor camera, it will still record locally for upto an hour. Without something similar or a POE wired option, I feel like Arlo has a huge vulnerability.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2023 15:59:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Micky5050</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-04-12T15:59:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Wi-Fi jammers</title>
      <link>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Arlo-Secure/Wi-Fi-jammers/m-p/1909732#M3606</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;How is Arlo counteracting Wi-Fi jammers? I am very invested in the Arlo ecosystem with multiple cameras, doorbell and monthly subscription.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, I don’t feel like staying loyal to it in the long run because they have not addressed a major flaw with their cameras - ie they can be jammed with cheap Wi-Fi jammers from eBay.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Even Nest has addressed this in the sense that if Wi-Fi connection is lost to the newest Nest outdoor camera, it will still record locally for upto an hour. Without something similar or a POE wired option, I feel like Arlo has a huge vulnerability.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2023 15:59:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Arlo-Secure/Wi-Fi-jammers/m-p/1909732#M3606</guid>
      <dc:creator>Micky5050</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-04-12T15:59:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wi-Fi jammers</title>
      <link>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Arlo-Secure/Wi-Fi-jammers/m-p/1909779#M3610</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I would tend to agree since most of the arlo camera products do not support on board storage.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Some arlo &amp;nbsp;base stations do support backup storage but that is down stream of the wifi so no joy.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Going to wired cameras is the only solution if you want to eliminate the risk of wifi jamming although pointing a laser pen at the camera to destroy the CCD pickup chip is a concern.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You could hide the cameras and remove the arlo sticker labels to start with.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2023 22:22:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Arlo-Secure/Wi-Fi-jammers/m-p/1909779#M3610</guid>
      <dc:creator>DannyBearAgain</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-04-12T22:22:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

