<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Arlo Q Review in Arlo Q</title>
    <link>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Arlo-Q/Arlo-Q-Review/m-p/1930593#M12225</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I recently scrapped my Sighthound/IP Camera setup for an Arlo Q setup. Arlo Q is not battery powered, and has a POE option, making it virtually the same (I think a bit better) as Nest. 1080p, night vision, motion detection, two way audio, intuitive mobile app.&lt;BR /&gt;I was getting tired of random issues with Sighthound and not finding great compatible cameras in the $100-200 range, and the Arlo Q price and feature set is perfect for me. I know the other Arlo cameras get a bad wrap for being battery powered, rightfully so, but if you don't need wireless power (or specifically want POE) the Arlo Q is great.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 08 Oct 2023 10:43:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>rogantano</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-10-08T10:43:20Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Arlo Q Review</title>
      <link>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Arlo-Q/Arlo-Q-Review/m-p/1930593#M12225</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I recently scrapped my Sighthound/IP Camera setup for an Arlo Q setup. Arlo Q is not battery powered, and has a POE option, making it virtually the same (I think a bit better) as Nest. 1080p, night vision, motion detection, two way audio, intuitive mobile app.&lt;BR /&gt;I was getting tired of random issues with Sighthound and not finding great compatible cameras in the $100-200 range, and the Arlo Q price and feature set is perfect for me. I know the other Arlo cameras get a bad wrap for being battery powered, rightfully so, but if you don't need wireless power (or specifically want POE) the Arlo Q is great.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Oct 2023 10:43:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Arlo-Q/Arlo-Q-Review/m-p/1930593#M12225</guid>
      <dc:creator>rogantano</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-10-08T10:43:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Arlo Q Review</title>
      <link>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Arlo-Q/Arlo-Q-Review/m-p/1930597#M12226</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes... the Q cam is a very good camera.&amp;nbsp; IMO, prob one of the best Arlo produced.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;BTW, if you didn't know the Q cameras ( or Q Plus ) use pixel change detection ( when picture changes it triggers ) over the normal IR detection. That and the "look back" 3 seconds on record file make for great vids.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As to the bad side, the Q cameras are now legacy, and are slated for EOL in Jan '25 and are no longer produced.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;see :&amp;nbsp; &lt;A href="https://kb.arlo.com/000063018/Arlo-Legacy-Cameras-End-of-Life" target="_blank"&gt;https://kb.arlo.com/000063018/Arlo-Legacy-Cameras-End-of-Life&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Oct 2023 12:34:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Arlo-Q/Arlo-Q-Review/m-p/1930597#M12226</guid>
      <dc:creator>TomMac</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-10-08T12:34:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

