<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Arlo Pro vs Pro 2 in Arlo Pro 2</title>
    <link>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Arlo-Pro-2/Arlo-Pro-vs-Pro-2/m-p/1398155#M2560</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I would assume it doesn't have DC power input therefore it doesn't have the newer features such as motion zones and 3 second delay compensation, which IMO defeats most of the purpose of what makes this wirefree alternative unique, now you are needing to consider running a power line to the camera. Where as the solar panel is just to charge not store, thus in theory should only have the additional features if it is day&amp;nbsp;time and receiving power.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2017 19:49:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>DvxAznxvb</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-10-17T19:49:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Arlo Pro vs Pro 2</title>
      <link>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Arlo-Pro-2/Arlo-Pro-vs-Pro-2/m-p/1391242#M2558</link>
      <description>Is the solar panel able to sustain a fully charged Arlo Pro if it is in live stream mode.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2017 22:41:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Arlo-Pro-2/Arlo-Pro-vs-Pro-2/m-p/1391242#M2558</guid>
      <dc:creator>wallmaxx</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-10-10T22:41:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Arlo Pro vs Pro 2</title>
      <link>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Arlo-Pro-2/Arlo-Pro-vs-Pro-2/m-p/1392052#M2559</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Define "live stream". It may not be able to keep up with continuous live view but would certainly slow down the battery drain.&amp;nbsp; If you mean the 24/7 CVR option, that's only available with AC power.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2017 16:45:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Arlo-Pro-2/Arlo-Pro-vs-Pro-2/m-p/1392052#M2559</guid>
      <dc:creator>jguerdat</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-10-11T16:45:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Arlo Pro vs Pro 2</title>
      <link>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Arlo-Pro-2/Arlo-Pro-vs-Pro-2/m-p/1398155#M2560</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I would assume it doesn't have DC power input therefore it doesn't have the newer features such as motion zones and 3 second delay compensation, which IMO defeats most of the purpose of what makes this wirefree alternative unique, now you are needing to consider running a power line to the camera. Where as the solar panel is just to charge not store, thus in theory should only have the additional features if it is day&amp;nbsp;time and receiving power.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2017 19:49:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Arlo-Pro-2/Arlo-Pro-vs-Pro-2/m-p/1398155#M2560</guid>
      <dc:creator>DvxAznxvb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-10-17T19:49:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

