<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Arlo Pro vs Pro 2 Recorded Video Quality in Arlo Pro 2</title>
    <link>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Arlo-Pro-2/Arlo-Pro-vs-Pro-2-Recorded-Video-Quality/m-p/1659290#M18527</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I have both Arlo and Arlo pro 2 cameras. They are all set at best quality video recording. I am shocked to see that there is NO difference in video quality between&amp;nbsp;Pro 2 and Pro. What is going on?&amp;nbsp;Is this just a big marketing scheme to get customers to buy "newer model"?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2018 17:21:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>soodvarun</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-12-10T17:21:21Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Arlo Pro vs Pro 2 Recorded Video Quality</title>
      <link>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Arlo-Pro-2/Arlo-Pro-vs-Pro-2-Recorded-Video-Quality/m-p/1659290#M18527</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have both Arlo and Arlo pro 2 cameras. They are all set at best quality video recording. I am shocked to see that there is NO difference in video quality between&amp;nbsp;Pro 2 and Pro. What is going on?&amp;nbsp;Is this just a big marketing scheme to get customers to buy "newer model"?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2018 17:21:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Arlo-Pro-2/Arlo-Pro-vs-Pro-2-Recorded-Video-Quality/m-p/1659290#M18527</guid>
      <dc:creator>soodvarun</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-10T17:21:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Arlo Pro vs Pro 2 Recorded Video Quality</title>
      <link>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Arlo-Pro-2/Arlo-Pro-vs-Pro-2-Recorded-Video-Quality/m-p/1659303#M18531</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;There are hardware differences between the two cameras also check the meta-data of the video file and you may see a difference&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2018 17:21:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Arlo-Pro-2/Arlo-Pro-vs-Pro-2-Recorded-Video-Quality/m-p/1659303#M18531</guid>
      <dc:creator>TomMac</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-10T17:21:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Arlo Pro vs Pro 2 Recorded Video Quality</title>
      <link>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Arlo-Pro-2/Arlo-Pro-vs-Pro-2-Recorded-Video-Quality/m-p/1659307#M18533</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Sorry but I am not going to tell the difference in quality of video by looking at META DATA!&amp;nbsp; I want to be able to see a great quality picture which comes with any 1080p device.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2018 17:21:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Arlo-Pro-2/Arlo-Pro-vs-Pro-2-Recorded-Video-Quality/m-p/1659307#M18533</guid>
      <dc:creator>soodvarun</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-10T17:21:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Arlo Pro vs Pro 2 Recorded Video Quality</title>
      <link>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Arlo-Pro-2/Arlo-Pro-vs-Pro-2-Recorded-Video-Quality/m-p/1659378#M18554</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If you think 1080 is great, you're sorely mistaken. It is 2 megapixels and then is compressed. The camera also shows 130 degrees angle of view which is equivalent to a 10mm DSLR fisheye lens. Your cheapest cell phone has much better resolution and has a smaller AOV.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2018 17:21:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Arlo-Pro-2/Arlo-Pro-vs-Pro-2-Recorded-Video-Quality/m-p/1659378#M18554</guid>
      <dc:creator>jguerdat</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-10T17:21:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

