<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Arlo Pro response is too slow to be considered a camera for security. in Arlo Pro</title>
    <link>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Arlo-Pro/Arlo-Pro-response-is-too-slow-to-be-considered-a-camera-for/m-p/1841426#M74138</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;If you have all the time in the world and your property and life are not a major concern. The Arlo Pro and Pro 2 will work just fine. Otherwise, I would advise you consider something else for security. These devices are good consumer novelty items but I wouldn't consider them personal or property security devices. First of all, they are incredibly slow to respond either manually when trying to view a camera or when triggered by motion to record. Typically I'm left with an unusable image because the recording starts too long after the motion was detected. The 3 second record ahead doesn't really help to resolve the slow response either. Now, if an intruder is tip-toeing in front of the camera and taking their sweet time committing a crime, then you may have a decent video.&amp;nbsp; However, I can walk up to my door triggering the sensor, unlock both locks with a key and enter without the Arlo recording a worthy video of my activity. Typically its just a brief image of me entering, not the unlocking of the door. Also, forget about viewing on Amazon Fire TV. Doorbell rings. "Alexa - show front door". Doorbell rings again, and again. 10-12 seconds later there is a live video of just a&amp;nbsp; doormat because the visitor already walked away. I could have already put on my slippers, went downstairs, and peeked through the curtains. I would expect much better on a gigabit network especially since I use wired Ethernet opposed to Wi-Fi to connect the Arlo base and my Fire TV Cube. To make matters worse. When I receive an alert on my phone and use the app to view the camera live, I have to put my safety on hold and view a sales Ad first. That's not what I would expect from a system marketed for security.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2021 19:31:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>cdickens</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-11-30T19:31:47Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Arlo Pro response is too slow to be considered a camera for security.</title>
      <link>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Arlo-Pro/Arlo-Pro-response-is-too-slow-to-be-considered-a-camera-for/m-p/1841426#M74138</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If you have all the time in the world and your property and life are not a major concern. The Arlo Pro and Pro 2 will work just fine. Otherwise, I would advise you consider something else for security. These devices are good consumer novelty items but I wouldn't consider them personal or property security devices. First of all, they are incredibly slow to respond either manually when trying to view a camera or when triggered by motion to record. Typically I'm left with an unusable image because the recording starts too long after the motion was detected. The 3 second record ahead doesn't really help to resolve the slow response either. Now, if an intruder is tip-toeing in front of the camera and taking their sweet time committing a crime, then you may have a decent video.&amp;nbsp; However, I can walk up to my door triggering the sensor, unlock both locks with a key and enter without the Arlo recording a worthy video of my activity. Typically its just a brief image of me entering, not the unlocking of the door. Also, forget about viewing on Amazon Fire TV. Doorbell rings. "Alexa - show front door". Doorbell rings again, and again. 10-12 seconds later there is a live video of just a&amp;nbsp; doormat because the visitor already walked away. I could have already put on my slippers, went downstairs, and peeked through the curtains. I would expect much better on a gigabit network especially since I use wired Ethernet opposed to Wi-Fi to connect the Arlo base and my Fire TV Cube. To make matters worse. When I receive an alert on my phone and use the app to view the camera live, I have to put my safety on hold and view a sales Ad first. That's not what I would expect from a system marketed for security.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2021 19:31:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Arlo-Pro/Arlo-Pro-response-is-too-slow-to-be-considered-a-camera-for/m-p/1841426#M74138</guid>
      <dc:creator>cdickens</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-11-30T19:31:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Arlo Pro response is too slow to be considered a camera for security.</title>
      <link>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Arlo-Pro/Arlo-Pro-response-is-too-slow-to-be-considered-a-camera-for/m-p/1842195#M74211</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://community.arlo.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/849147"&gt;@cdickens&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have you tried adjusting the sensitivity of your camera? Please make sure you have the camera(s) positioned properly for the best results, you can find more info here:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://kb.arlo.com/37/How-do-I-position-my-Arlo-wire-free-camera" target="_blank"&gt;Arlo Camera Placement Tips&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please make sure you have the latest version of the Arlo App installed on your phone.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2021 23:27:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Arlo-Pro/Arlo-Pro-response-is-too-slow-to-be-considered-a-camera-for/m-p/1842195#M74211</guid>
      <dc:creator>ShayneS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-03T23:27:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

