<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Mounting camera upside down solved motion detection issue - why? in Arlo Pro</title>
    <link>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Arlo-Pro/Mounting-camera-upside-down-solved-motion-detection-issue-why/m-p/1583894#M38797</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;it could be the difference in the Fresnel lens for the PIR... maybe "weighted" more on the top ( which is now on the bottom )&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2018 13:12:54 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>TomMac</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-06-02T13:12:54Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Mounting camera upside down solved motion detection issue - why?</title>
      <link>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Arlo-Pro/Mounting-camera-upside-down-solved-motion-detection-issue-why/m-p/1583782#M38789</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I mounted my new Arlo camera rightside-up about 7 feet above my back porch angled about 40 degrees down and it would not reliably detect me walking across the field of view about 5 feet away unless the sensitivity was set to 100%.&amp;nbsp; At 95% it occasionally detected me, and at 90% it didn't detect me at all.&amp;nbsp; Unfortunately, 100% sensitivty outside results in a steady stream of false alerts.&amp;nbsp; After reading some other posts here, I decided to&amp;nbsp;try mounting it upside-down and, to my surprise, it now reliably detects me with the sensitivity set to 75% (which means virtually no false alerts.)&amp;nbsp; I'm a techie, but I can't for the life of me understand why being upside-down made such a difference.&amp;nbsp; Anyone have any ideas?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2018 03:10:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Arlo-Pro/Mounting-camera-upside-down-solved-motion-detection-issue-why/m-p/1583782#M38789</guid>
      <dc:creator>Teuton</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-06-02T03:10:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Mounting camera upside down solved motion detection issue - why?</title>
      <link>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Arlo-Pro/Mounting-camera-upside-down-solved-motion-detection-issue-why/m-p/1583894#M38797</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;it could be the difference in the Fresnel lens for the PIR... maybe "weighted" more on the top ( which is now on the bottom )&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2018 13:12:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Arlo-Pro/Mounting-camera-upside-down-solved-motion-detection-issue-why/m-p/1583894#M38797</guid>
      <dc:creator>TomMac</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-06-02T13:12:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

