<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Arlo Pro vs Arlo Q in Arlo Pro</title>
    <link>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Arlo-Pro/Arlo-Pro-vs-Arlo-Q/m-p/1179210#M2292</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I have also been through this thought process.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Over and above the higher resolution, the nice thing about the Q is that it's externally powered right out of the box and offers 24/7 video monitoring plus optional 24/7 cloud recording.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you don't&amp;nbsp;need the higher res. and the 24/7 features, but like the external power, then you could remove the battery and still externally power your pros. from an inexpensive USB 5v 1.5A power supply.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2016 00:47:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Streak2</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-11-30T00:47:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Arlo Pro vs Arlo Q</title>
      <link>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Arlo-Pro/Arlo-Pro-vs-Arlo-Q/m-p/1179133#M2284</link>
      <description>Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I just recently bought an Arlo Pro two camera system. I also purchased an Arlo Q. I do like the Arlo Pro system and will be primarily using it for outdoor surveillance. The intention was to use the Arlo Q indoors for the kids. However, speaking from a price point perspective I could get a 4 camera Arlo pro for about $115 more. My question is am I better off going with a 4 camera Pro system or should I stick with the Arlo pro 2 cam system with 1 Arlo Q? Are there any benefits of the Arlo Q over the Pro other than 1080p vs 720p? I'm kind of torn at the moment as to whether or not I should return the 2 cam system and Arlo Q for the 4 cam Arlo Pro pack instead. Keep in mind I only need two cams outside.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2016 23:44:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Arlo-Pro/Arlo-Pro-vs-Arlo-Q/m-p/1179133#M2284</guid>
      <dc:creator>DayDad</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-11-29T23:44:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Arlo Pro vs Arlo Q</title>
      <link>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Arlo-Pro/Arlo-Pro-vs-Arlo-Q/m-p/1179210#M2292</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have also been through this thought process.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Over and above the higher resolution, the nice thing about the Q is that it's externally powered right out of the box and offers 24/7 video monitoring plus optional 24/7 cloud recording.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you don't&amp;nbsp;need the higher res. and the 24/7 features, but like the external power, then you could remove the battery and still externally power your pros. from an inexpensive USB 5v 1.5A power supply.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2016 00:47:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Arlo-Pro/Arlo-Pro-vs-Arlo-Q/m-p/1179210#M2292</guid>
      <dc:creator>Streak2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-11-30T00:47:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Arlo Pro vs Arlo Q</title>
      <link>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Arlo-Pro/Arlo-Pro-vs-Arlo-Q/m-p/1179247#M2296</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The Q has a superior 'sense' method.... It works on pixel change vs the Pro using PIRs&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Pixel change is it detects changes from what the camera actually sees.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Other diff is the Q is not outdoor rated.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2016 01:47:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Arlo-Pro/Arlo-Pro-vs-Arlo-Q/m-p/1179247#M2296</guid>
      <dc:creator>TomMac</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-11-30T01:47:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

