topic Re: Is sensitivity REALLY set at camera level? in Features

Is sensitivity REALLY set at camera level?

PaulOckenden — Mon, 03 Oct 2016 03:49:34 GMT

He's my current test situation:

If motion on A record video on A

If motion on B record video on B

If motion on A record video on B

If motion on B record video on A

If motion on C record video on C

So as you can see, A and B are linked via triggers, but C is completely separate. C is also this last rule in the list (that might be important).

I've noticed that if I turn the sentivity of that last rule (for C) up to 100, A and B also trigger much more frequently.

This is 100% reproducible here.

Re: Is sensitivity REALLY set at camera level?

jguerdat — Tue, 13 Sep 2016 13:28:52 GMT

While I don't use nested rules, I believe the suggestion is to use the same settings for all cameras for exactly this reason. No idea why they're coupled like that.

Re: Is sensitivity REALLY set at camera level?

PaulOckenden — Tue, 13 Sep 2016 13:40:44 GMT

That's been recommended where one PIR triggers who recordings (A and B in my example above), but it shouldn't affect C surely?

Re: Is sensitivity REALLY set at camera level?

jguerdat — Tue, 13 Sep 2016 23:26:18 GMT

I'd say its the logic in the software. If it's wrong, opening a case with support raises awareness and tracking.

Re: Is sensitivity REALLY set at camera level?

JamesC — Tue, 20 Sep 2016 15:53:31 GMT

PaulOckenden,

Thank you for the report. I will escalate this topic for further investigation.

JamesC