<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Motion detection test and actual triggering performance don't match in Features</title>
    <link>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Features/Motion-detection-test-and-actual-triggering-performance-don-t/m-p/1118173#M7257</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I&amp;nbsp;have my garage camera set so it triggers very nicely when I run the motion detection test.&amp;nbsp; Yellow LED flashes consistantly for specific motion paterns.&amp;nbsp; Then, when I change to armed camera mode I have to get like half as close to the camera to trigger a recording.&amp;nbsp; What's with that?&amp;nbsp; Very frustrating.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Went back an forth between the two modes and the behavior difference is consistant.&amp;nbsp; BTW, detection sensitivity is set at 100%.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How can this be?&amp;nbsp; Anybody else seen this behaviour?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2016 03:40:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ricknau</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-10-03T03:40:20Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Motion detection test and actual triggering performance don't match</title>
      <link>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Features/Motion-detection-test-and-actual-triggering-performance-don-t/m-p/1118173#M7257</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I&amp;nbsp;have my garage camera set so it triggers very nicely when I run the motion detection test.&amp;nbsp; Yellow LED flashes consistantly for specific motion paterns.&amp;nbsp; Then, when I change to armed camera mode I have to get like half as close to the camera to trigger a recording.&amp;nbsp; What's with that?&amp;nbsp; Very frustrating.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Went back an forth between the two modes and the behavior difference is consistant.&amp;nbsp; BTW, detection sensitivity is set at 100%.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How can this be?&amp;nbsp; Anybody else seen this behaviour?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2016 03:40:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Features/Motion-detection-test-and-actual-triggering-performance-don-t/m-p/1118173#M7257</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ricknau</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-03T03:40:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Motion detection test and actual triggering performance don't match</title>
      <link>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Features/Motion-detection-test-and-actual-triggering-performance-don-t/m-p/1118370#M7258</link>
      <description>Uhh... May be operator error. Have test set to 100% sensitivity but now see that camera is at 50%. That is, adjusting the sensitivity in test mode doesn't set the camera's sensitivity. Must exit the test and go to "armed" screen to actually set the camera sensitivity.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Will test this afternoon.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2016 13:57:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Features/Motion-detection-test-and-actual-triggering-performance-don-t/m-p/1118370#M7258</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ricknau</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-07-25T13:57:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Motion detection test and actual triggering performance don't match</title>
      <link>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Features/Motion-detection-test-and-actual-triggering-performance-don-t/m-p/1119099#M7259</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Ricknau,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Correct, camera sensitivity can be adjusted per the rules within the mode. Motion detection test sensitivity does not dictate the sensitivity for an "Armed" camera, only for the test.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Let us know your results!&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;JamesC&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2016 20:46:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Features/Motion-detection-test-and-actual-triggering-performance-don-t/m-p/1119099#M7259</guid>
      <dc:creator>JamesC</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-07-26T20:46:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Motion detection test and actual triggering performance don't match</title>
      <link>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Features/Motion-detection-test-and-actual-triggering-performance-don-t/m-p/1119205#M7260</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yeah, the behavior now matches.&amp;nbsp; "facepalm"&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2016 01:46:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Features/Motion-detection-test-and-actual-triggering-performance-don-t/m-p/1119205#M7260</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ricknau</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-07-27T01:46:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

