<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Arlo Pro 2 and Arlo Go in Features</title>
    <link>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Features/Arlo-Pro-2-and-Arlo-Go/m-p/1407715#M14815</link>
    <description>1.) IFTTT functions broken&lt;BR /&gt;2.) Apple HomeKit integration not existent&lt;BR /&gt;3.) Stringify functions usless&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I really like these cameras as stand alone products, but the current inability to integrate with the existing “internet of things” makes me not like them as much as I could. Reading fourum posts indicates IFTTT used to work, but I can attest it is broken for Arlo Pro 2 and Arlo Go.</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2017 13:29:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Kirk1811</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-10-27T13:29:03Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Arlo Pro 2 and Arlo Go</title>
      <link>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Features/Arlo-Pro-2-and-Arlo-Go/m-p/1407715#M14815</link>
      <description>1.) IFTTT functions broken&lt;BR /&gt;2.) Apple HomeKit integration not existent&lt;BR /&gt;3.) Stringify functions usless&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I really like these cameras as stand alone products, but the current inability to integrate with the existing “internet of things” makes me not like them as much as I could. Reading fourum posts indicates IFTTT used to work, but I can attest it is broken for Arlo Pro 2 and Arlo Go.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2017 13:29:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Features/Arlo-Pro-2-and-Arlo-Go/m-p/1407715#M14815</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kirk1811</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-10-27T13:29:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

