<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Arlo VS VueZone in Buying Options &amp; Tips</title>
    <link>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Buying-Options-Tips/Arlo-VS-VueZone/m-p/787#M87</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Why would I want to buy Arlo instead of the less expensive VueZone? My intended use is strictly to monitor the front door.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2016 04:28:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Froyd</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-09-26T04:28:58Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Arlo VS VueZone</title>
      <link>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Buying-Options-Tips/Arlo-VS-VueZone/m-p/787#M87</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Why would I want to buy Arlo instead of the less expensive VueZone? My intended use is strictly to monitor the front door.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2016 04:28:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Buying-Options-Tips/Arlo-VS-VueZone/m-p/787#M87</guid>
      <dc:creator>Froyd</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-09-26T04:28:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Arlo VS VueZone</title>
      <link>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Buying-Options-Tips/Arlo-VS-VueZone/m-p/791#M88</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have an older Vuezone system and Not to say that the Vuezone wouldn't work for you if watching a static location&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But, IMO, the quality of the images are so much better it's worth it. Esp with the video in 720p.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's like any second generational product, they use all the past info and just plain make a better functioning unit.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As soon as I can I'm replacing all my Vuezones.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PS. and the new Arlo have IR built in for night vision ( in total darkness ) you get a very good pic&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2015 22:45:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Buying-Options-Tips/Arlo-VS-VueZone/m-p/791#M88</guid>
      <dc:creator>TomMac</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-23T22:45:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Arlo VS VueZone</title>
      <link>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Buying-Options-Tips/Arlo-VS-VueZone/m-p/802#M89</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the response. I appreciate&amp;nbsp;hearing from someone who's used both systems and I'll go ahead with the Arlo.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;73!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2015 15:49:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Buying-Options-Tips/Arlo-VS-VueZone/m-p/802#M89</guid>
      <dc:creator>Froyd</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-24T15:49:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Arlo VS VueZone</title>
      <link>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Buying-Options-Tips/Arlo-VS-VueZone/m-p/832#M91</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;also have both systems and will definitely state that the image quality as well as camera build is by far superior on the ARLO.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;But, and just a thought, with the release of the ARLO some great deals may be available on the 2nd Gen versions of the VuEZone. For just monitoring a Front Door, a VueZone will do the job. But the ARLO is a great product.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;But please also remember that the ARLO Camera line are all Weather Resistant regardless of what version. Not the case on the VueZones.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2015 14:46:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Buying-Options-Tips/Arlo-VS-VueZone/m-p/832#M91</guid>
      <dc:creator>wyreless</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-26T14:46:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Arlo VS VueZone</title>
      <link>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Buying-Options-Tips/Arlo-VS-VueZone/m-p/838#M94</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I bought a Vuezone from Costco last spring and absolutely love the wireless setup of the cameras.&amp;nbsp; One of the things that I hope Arlo will address is the delay time from when motion is detected to when the recording actually starts.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2015 19:28:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Buying-Options-Tips/Arlo-VS-VueZone/m-p/838#M94</guid>
      <dc:creator>Spacejamz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-26T19:28:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Arlo VS VueZone</title>
      <link>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Buying-Options-Tips/Arlo-VS-VueZone/m-p/840#M95</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks Wyre, the better picture quality for not much more $ is the direction I'm taking. Since this is an internet-based device, I'm also concerned about having continued support for Vuezone.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2015 19:43:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Buying-Options-Tips/Arlo-VS-VueZone/m-p/840#M95</guid>
      <dc:creator>Froyd</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-26T19:43:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Arlo VS VueZone</title>
      <link>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Buying-Options-Tips/Arlo-VS-VueZone/m-p/841#M96</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yeah Spacejamz, I see the same comments on the video recording for the Arlo. Probably a battery-saving issue. For an outdoor camera, perhaps installing a&amp;nbsp;motion sensor porch light might help. If the porch light's motion sensor is more sensitive and comes on earlier, it could&amp;nbsp;activate&amp;nbsp;the camera and start the recording process a bit quicker. That problem doesn't affect my purchase decision too much - all I'm interested in is a way to see who's at the door of a rental without drilling holes and running wires. I only wish it wasn't necessary to involve the internet gods to do it. :-}&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2015 19:58:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.arlo.com/t5/Buying-Options-Tips/Arlo-VS-VueZone/m-p/841#M96</guid>
      <dc:creator>Froyd</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-26T19:58:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

